Can we do more harm than good when defending the truth with incorrect reasoning?

In mid-December the movie, Prince of Egypt, opened in theaters across the country. Because it differs so widely from the usual movie fare of sex and violence, this production is receiving high acclaim—even from religious figures like Billy Graham, James Dobson, Robert Schuller, and others.

Everyone understands that whenever Hollywood does a movie about some historical character, a good measure of literary license is taken.

It is commonly charged that certain documents of the Old Testament are unbalanced in terms of sexual matters? This allegation reflects a misunderstanding of the sacred text. This week’s Question addresses this matter.

Why do some Bible verses seem to indicate some people were forgiven without repentance?

Does the Bible have the fingerprints of God within its pages?

A seemingly casual reference to the eagle’s wing more than 2,700 years ago is remarkably scientifically accurate.

According to the doctrine of dispensational premillennialism (a view endorsed by many today), the “church” was not a part of the divine plan of redemption initially. But that view is not consistent with divine revelation.

This essay addresses a verse commonly used in support of the false doctrine of original sin.

Do the absence of certain “millennial events” disprove the existence of God and the inspiration of the Bible. Not in the least. They do, however, disprove popular millennial theories.

Spiritually, it is not an easy thing, in a world immersed in wickedness, to live a life dedicated to obeying the law of God.

Denominationalists are vulnerable in defending creation due to erroneous views of the fall of man.

We are grateful for Robert Dick Wilson’s masterful work confirming the credibility of the Old Testament.

This article is a response to professor Philip Hefner’s Newsweek article repudiating miracles.

Does your soul need to be restored? The Great Shepherd of Psalm 23 promises to restore our souls.

While some modern day religionists deny the eternal deity of Jesus Christ, the Bible teaches differently. One example of such a conflict is the Watchtower organization’s denial that Jesus is Jehovah.

While some modern day religionists deny the eternal deity of Jesus Christ, the Bible teaches differently. One example of such a conflict is the Watchtower organization’s denial that Jesus is Jehovah.

Have you ever heard or read a statement that made you wonder how it ever could have been conceived? For example Bill O’Reilly, Fox News guru, said on national television that “the Catholic Church invented marriage” (WorldNetDaily, 2/10/2010). How does anyone that obtuse deserve a national audience? But he is not alone. Consider a few more quotes that are “simply outrageous.”

May women participate in decision-making roles if there are no qualified men to serve as elders?

Is “necessary inference” a valid method of arriving at biblical truth?