In Romans 8:19-23, Paul addresses the hope that eventually the creation will be set free from the “bondage of corruption into the liberty of the glory of the children of God.”

In what sense will the “creation” be delivered from corruption? Does the creation itself, including the stars, planets, rocks and trees, really long for the return of Christ?

An ancient archaeological find shows striking similarities between the Babylonians’ understanding of the history of creation and the creation account of Genesis.

This article is a listing of some of the many truths to be discovered from a study of Genesis chapter one.

This article attempts to determine the meaning of the term “days” in connection with the creation week.

Some suggest that Genesis 1 and 2 are not literal accounts of actual history. Instead, much of the narrative is poetic, with elements of history embedded. But what does the evidence show?

Is the common claim that Genesis 1 is merely an ancient myth accurate?

As the inspired Paul affirms to the Romans, the natural world around us points to the existence and attributes of the Creator.

The ridiculous creation fables of mankind only serve to emphasize the genuineness of the Genesis account of the beginning.

The Psalmist affirmed that “the heavens declare the glory of God.” In this week’s Penpoints, Jason Jackson explores some of the wonders of the starry hosts that decorate the night skies.

Are the days of the creation literal 24-hour days or extended ages of time? Exodus 20:8-11 provides the answer.

Was the seventh-day sabbath a divine requirement from the seventh day of creation onward? Some so claim, but the evidence is lacking. Study this issue with us.

The liberal voices in the school of “Critical Theory” frequently assert that there are two accounts of creation in Genesis. This article answers this attack.

This is a commentary over the battle currently taking place at Baylor University over the issue of creation science.

In an attempt to harmonize the biblical record with evolutionary chronology, some allege that the creation description of Genesis 1 is merely metaphorical. Such a position thrusts aside responsible interpretative procedure.

For Bible believers, there can be no compromise between evolutionary chronology and the biblical historical record.

Does starlight require millions of years to reach the earth?

Some point to Genesis 1:1-2 as a biblical basis for the Gap Theory. Yet a brief study of the grammar of this passage shows there is no such basis.

There is a popular view that “heaven” will be on “earth,” after our planet has been purged by fire at the end of time. This theory is wholly without merit and results from a failure to understand the symbolic nature of several passages of scripture.